CCDB Header
Prof. Itay Mayrose Lab – Plant Evolution, Bioinformatics, & Comparative Genomics







CCDB is a community resource. If you are aware of any missing data or if any of the counts are erroneous, please submit new counts, or report erroneous counts.


CCDB → Angiosperms → Compositae → Hieracium → Hieracium lachenalii C. C. Gmel.

7 chromosome counts in Hieracium lachenalii C. C. Gmel.:


Name Accepted Name Gametophytic(n) Sporophytic(2n) Data Source reference
!   Hieracium lachenalii C. C. Gmel. Hieracium lachenalii subsp. cruentifolium (Dahlst. & Lübeck) Zahn   27 Hieracium Gentcheff 1937a; Krahulcov? 1990
!   Hieracium lachenalii C. C. Gmel. Hieracium lachenalii subsp. cruentifolium (Dahlst. & Lübeck) Zahn   36 Hieracium Lavrenko & Serditov 1987
!   Hieracium lachenalii C. C. Gmel. Hieracium lachenalii subsp. cruentifolium (Dahlst. & Lübeck) Zahn   36 IPCN online Lavrenko, A. N. & N. P. Serditov. 1987. Chromosome numbers in some members of the Urals flora (the Komi Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic). Bot. Zhurn. SSSR 72: 846–847.
!   Hieracium lachenalii C. C. Gmel. Hieracium lachenalii subsp. cruentifolium (Dahlst. & Lübeck) Zahn   27 IPCN online Krahulcová, A. 1990. Selected chromosome counts of the Czechoslovak flora II. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 25: 381–388.
!   Hieracium lachenalii C. C. Gmel. Hieracium lachenalii subsp. cruentifolium (Dahlst. & Lübeck) Zahn   27 IPCN online Schuhwerk, F. & W. Lippert. 1998. Chromosomenzahlen von Hieracium (Compositae, Lactuceae) Teil 2. Sendtnera 5: 269–286.
!   Hieracium lachenalii C. C. Gmel. Hieracium lachenalii subsp. cruentifolium (Dahlst. & Lübeck) Zahn   27 IPCN online Chrtek. 2004. Chromosome numbers in selected species of Hieracium s. str. (Hieracium subgen. Hieracium) in the western Carpathians. Preslia 76(2): 119–139.
!   Hieracium lachenalii C. C. Gmel. Hieracium lachenalii subsp. cruentifolium (Dahlst. & Lübeck) Zahn   27 C-values database Chrtek J, Jr, Zahradnicek J, Krak K, Fehrer J. 2009. Genome size in Hieracium subgenus Hieracium (Asteraceae) is strongly correlated with major phylogenetic groups. Annals of Botany 104: 161-178.